LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The global economy would see little benefit if the world's central bankers coordinated monetary policy, a top Federal Reserve official said on Monday in defense of America's easy money stance.
To fight a recession and nurse the U.S. economy back to health, the Fed has held short-term interest rates near zero since 2008 while printing trillions of dollars to buy up bonds.
This strategy has provoked concern among the world's central banks, particularly in developing economies where some policymakers worry Washington's exotic stimulus programs are destabilizing financial markets. The Fed's signal last year that it would soon begin trimming bond purchases triggered sell-offs in global financial markets, although reaction to the actual winding down of the purchases has been more modest.
India's central bank chief has argued that the world's central banks should coordinate their policies, but St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard weighed in against this strategy.
"Possible gains are small, and it would be hard to get the world's policymakers to play the cooperative (approach)," Bullard said in prepared remarks for a business conference.
Bullard said he thought the Fed's aggressive bond buying and its pledges to keep interest rates low were effective policies for boosting U.S. economic growth. Coordinating policies globally would only make sense if this were not the case, he said.
In what he described as the traditional view in central banking, Bullard said central banks are best served by using interest rate policy to keep domestic inflation under control.
Bullard does not vote on the Fed's policy-setting panel this year, but he takes part in policy discussions at the Fed's regular meetings in Washington. He will not rotate into a voting seat until 2016.
(Reporting by Tim Reid; Additional reporting by Jason Lange in Washington; Editing by Andrea Ricci)